bull
New Member
Posts: 14 
|
Ya or nay
Feb 24, 2015 8:19:53 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by bull on Feb 24, 2015 8:19:53 GMT -8
Value alone
Dynasty
I get Dickerson/Dan. Norris/Archie Bradley
for
Harper
|
|
|
|
Post by tigers312 on Feb 24, 2015 9:13:55 GMT -8
No way man. Harper still has too much upside..don't sell low right now
|
|
|
|
Post by pogotheostrich on Feb 24, 2015 11:02:59 GMT -8
I'd hold on to Harper
|
|
|
|
Post by mashinspuds on Feb 24, 2015 11:38:32 GMT -8
I would also hang onto Harper. He has his ups and downs, but he is still young and he's going to stick in the league. Dickerson has had one good year and, without as much pedigree, he is debatable in terms of skill down the road. Norris and Bradley look to be fine arms, but are they guaranteed? If it was Giolito/Rodon then there would be a stronger case for the trade, but I think you have to stick with the more proven guy here.
|
|
|
|
Post by element on Feb 24, 2015 11:52:47 GMT -8
I still believe in Harper.
|
|
|
|
Post by ensanimal on Feb 24, 2015 19:16:04 GMT -8
nay
|
|
|
|
Post by theartfuldodger on Feb 24, 2015 19:59:34 GMT -8
I'm a believer in Dickerson, but Harper still carries the best overall potential of any of those players in the trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by steelcity79 on Feb 24, 2015 20:53:34 GMT -8
Don't do it !
|
|
|
|
Post by aussiedodger on Feb 26, 2015 7:12:26 GMT -8
If you can get a real major leaguer instead of one of those two prospects, I'd do this. Dickerson is the real deal
|
|
|
|
Post by thetrith on Feb 26, 2015 15:22:03 GMT -8
For this year I actually prefer Dickerson. Long term Harper has higher upside.
I think that its a fairly even trade at this point in time, even though last spring the thought would have been completely ludicrous.
|
|
